Burkina Faso vs Libya: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Burkina Faso
0
in 2025
Libya
0
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
87th
Libya rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Libya
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0 against 0 in Libya, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Libya ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 87th and Libya ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Libya Difference Ahead
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 1 0 1 Burkina Faso
2010s 0.9 0.1 0.8 Burkina Faso
2020s 0.3333 0 0.3333 Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Burkina Faso or Libya?
Burkina Faso, at 0 against 0 in Libya as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Burkina Faso and Libya?
0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Libya?
85 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Burkina Faso and Libya rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Burkina Faso ranks 87th and Libya ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.