Burkina Faso vs Comoros: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Burkina Faso
0
in 2025
Comoros
0
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
87th
Comoros rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Comoros
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0 against 0 in Comoros, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 79 shared years of data; in 1947 it was Comoros ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 87th and Comoros ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Comoros Difference Ahead
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 1 0 1 Burkina Faso
2010s 0.9 0 0.9 Burkina Faso
2020s 0.3333 0 0.3333 Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Burkina Faso or Comoros?
Burkina Faso, at 0 against 0 in Comoros as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Burkina Faso and Comoros?
0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Comoros?
79 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2025.
How do Burkina Faso and Comoros rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Burkina Faso ranks 87th and Comoros ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.