Bolivia vs North Macedonia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Bolivia
1
in 2025
North Macedonia
1
in 2025
Bolivia rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Bolivia
  • North Macedonia
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 1 against 1 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 198 shared years of data; in 1825 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 21 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 4 and North Macedonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1820s 0 0 0 β€”
1830s 0 0 0 β€”
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0.4 0 0.4 Bolivia
1990s 1 0.2 0.8 Bolivia
2000s 1 0.8 0.2 Bolivia
2010s 0.9 0.4 0.5 Bolivia
2020s 0.8333 1 0.1667 North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Bolivia or North Macedonia?
Bolivia, at 1 against 1 in North Macedonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Bolivia and North Macedonia?
0, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and North Macedonia?
198 years are reported by both, from 1825 to 2025.
How do Bolivia and North Macedonia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Bolivia ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.