Bolivia vs Gambia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Bolivia
1
in 2025
Gambia
1
in 2025
Bolivia rank
1st
Gambia rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Bolivia
  • Gambia
00.20.40.60.81182519252025

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 1 against 1 in Gambia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Gambia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 1st and Gambia ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Gambia Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0.4 0 0.4 Bolivia
1990s 1 0 1 Bolivia
2000s 1 0 1 Bolivia
2010s 0.9 0.2 0.7 Bolivia
2020s 0.8333 0.8333 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Bolivia or Gambia?
Bolivia, at 1 against 1 in Gambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Bolivia and Gambia?
0, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Gambia?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Bolivia and Gambia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Bolivia ranks 1st and Gambia ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.