Bhutan vs Fiji: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Bhutan
1
in 2025
Fiji
1
in 2025
Bhutan rank
1st
Fiji rank
1st
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Bhutan
- Fiji
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 1 against 1 in Fiji, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Fiji ahead.
Bhutan ranks 1st and Fiji ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Fiji in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Fiji |
| 1980s | 0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | Fiji |
| 1990s | 0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | Fiji |
| 2000s | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | Fiji |
| 2010s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Bhutan or Fiji?
- Bhutan, at 1 against 1 in Fiji as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Bhutan and Fiji?
- 0, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Fiji?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Fiji rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Bhutan ranks 1st and Fiji ranks 1st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.