Bangladesh vs Cambodia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Bangladesh
0
in 2025
Cambodia
0
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
87th
Cambodia rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Cambodia
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0 against 0 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Cambodia ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 87th and Cambodia ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Cambodia Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0.8 0 0.8 Bangladesh
2000s 0.2 0 0.2 Bangladesh
2010s 0 0 0 β€”
2020s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Bangladesh or Cambodia?
Bangladesh, at 0 against 0 in Cambodia as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Bangladesh and Cambodia?
0, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Cambodia?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Cambodia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Bangladesh ranks 87th and Cambodia ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.