Austria vs Gambia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Austria
1
in 2025
Gambia
1
in 2025
Austria rank
1st
Gambia rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Austria
  • Gambia
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Austria currently reports 1 against 1 in Gambia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 120 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Gambia ahead.

Austria ranks 1st and Gambia ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Gambia Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0.9 0 0.9 Austria
1930s 0.3333 0 0.3333 Austria
1940s 1 0 1 Austria
1950s 1 0 1 Austria
1960s 1 0 1 Austria
1970s 1 0 1 Austria
1980s 1 0 1 Austria
1990s 1 0 1 Austria
2000s 1 0 1 Austria
2010s 1 0.2 0.8 Austria
2020s 1 0.8333 0.1667 Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Austria or Gambia?
Austria, at 1 against 1 in Gambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Austria and Gambia?
0, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Gambia?
120 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Austria and Gambia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Austria ranks 1st and Gambia ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.