Armenia vs Paraguay: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Armenia
1
in 2025
Paraguay
1
in 2025
Armenia rank
1st
Paraguay rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Armenia
  • Paraguay
00.20.40.60.81181119182025

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 1 against 1 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Paraguay ahead.

Armenia ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Paraguay Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0.5 0.7 0.2 Paraguay
2000s 0 1 1 Paraguay
2010s 0.2 1 0.8 Paraguay
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Armenia or Paraguay?
Armenia, at 1 against 1 in Paraguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Armenia and Paraguay?
0, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Paraguay?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Armenia and Paraguay rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Armenia ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.