Argentina vs Suriname: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Argentina
1
in 2025
Suriname
1
in 2025
Argentina rank
1st
Suriname rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Argentina
  • Suriname
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 1 against 1 in Suriname, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Suriname ahead.

Argentina ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Suriname Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0.5 0.5 Suriname
1960s 0.2 1 0.8 Suriname
1970s 0.2 0.9 0.7 Suriname
1980s 0.6 0.2 0.4 Argentina
1990s 1 0.9 0.1 Argentina
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Argentina or Suriname?
Argentina, at 1 against 1 in Suriname as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Argentina and Suriname?
0, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Suriname?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Argentina and Suriname rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Argentina ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.