Algeria vs Turkey: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Algeria
0
in 2025
Turkey
0
in 2025
Algeria rank
87th
Turkey rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Algeria
  • Turkey
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Algeria currently reports 0 against 0 in Turkey, a difference of 0.

Across all 126 years both countries report, Turkey has been ahead every year.

Algeria ranks 87th and Turkey ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Turkey Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0.4 0.4 Turkey
1970s 0 0.8 0.8 Turkey
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 1 1 Turkey
2000s 0 1 1 Turkey
2010s 0 0.3 0.3 Turkey
2020s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Algeria or Turkey?
Algeria, at 0 against 0 in Turkey as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Algeria and Turkey?
0, with Algeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Turkey?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Algeria and Turkey rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Algeria ranks 87th and Turkey ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.