Lesotho vs North Macedonia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Lesotho
-0.3024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
North Macedonia
-0.3292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Lesotho rank
113th
North Macedonia rank
115th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Lesotho
  • North Macedonia
-1-0.75-0.5-0.2500.25199620102024

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports -0.3024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0268 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.

Lesotho ranks 113th and North Macedonia ranks 115th of 204 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.3596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.239 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Lesotho
2000s -0.1576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5345 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3769 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Lesotho
2010s 0.1007 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2684 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Lesotho
2020s -0.1827 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3717 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Lesotho or North Macedonia?
Lesotho, at -0.3024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Lesotho and North Macedonia?
0.0268 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and North Macedonia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Lesotho and North Macedonia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Lesotho ranks 113th and North Macedonia ranks 115th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs North Macedonia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/lesotho/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/lesotho/north-macedonia/">Lesotho vs North Macedonia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.