Honduras vs Zimbabwe: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Honduras
-1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Zimbabwe
-1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Honduras rank
181st
Zimbabwe rank
182nd

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Honduras
  • Zimbabwe
-1.5-1.2-1-0.75-0.5199620102024

How they compare

Honduras currently reports -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Honduras ranks 181st and Zimbabwe ranks 182nd of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5386 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.564 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Zimbabwe
2000s -0.9927 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Honduras
2010s -0.9849 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3789 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Honduras
2020s -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1066 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Honduras or Zimbabwe?
Honduras, at -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Honduras and Zimbabwe?
0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Honduras and Zimbabwe rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Honduras ranks 181st and Zimbabwe ranks 182nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Zimbabwe: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/honduras/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/honduras/zimbabwe/">Honduras vs Zimbabwe: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.