Guatemala vs Mauritania: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Guatemala
-0.9483 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mauritania
-0.9337 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Guatemala rank
161st
Mauritania rank
158th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Guatemala
  • Mauritania
-1.2-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2199620102024

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports -0.9337 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9483 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0146 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritania ahead.

Guatemala ranks 161st and Mauritania ranks 158th of 204 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s -0.7783 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.559 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2194 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2000s -0.6268 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2010s -0.8173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8143 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.003 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2020s -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8497 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2642 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Guatemala or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at -0.9337 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9483 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guatemala as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Guatemala and Mauritania?
0.0146 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mauritania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Mauritania rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Guatemala ranks 161st and Mauritania ranks 158th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Mauritania: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/guatemala/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/guatemala/mauritania/">Guatemala vs Mauritania: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.