Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mauritania
Mauritania: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.9454 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Mauritania, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for control of corruption - governance estimate in Mauritania is -0.9454 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.2% on the previous year and up 0.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance estimate in Mauritania peaked at -0.2909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002 and was at its lowest, -0.9809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2019.
That places Mauritania 166th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mauritania, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.5636 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.5665 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.5% |
| 2000 | -0.5745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.4% |
| 2002 | -0.2909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -49.4% |
| 2003 | -0.2928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2004 | -0.5741 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +96.1% |
| 2005 | -0.6759 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.7% |
| 2006 | -0.6255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.5% |
| 2007 | -0.5407 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.6% |
| 2008 | -0.7991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +47.8% |
| 2009 | -0.7109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.0% |
| 2010 | -0.6174 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.2% |
| 2011 | -0.5431 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.0% |
| 2012 | -0.7361 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +35.5% |
| 2013 | -0.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.7% |
| 2014 | -0.9217 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.2% |
| 2015 | -0.9527 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.4% |
| 2016 | -0.8326 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.6% |
| 2017 | -0.8709 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.6% |
| 2018 | -0.8954 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.8% |
| 2019 | -0.9809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.6% |
| 2020 | -0.7813 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -20.4% |
| 2021 | -0.8696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.3% |
| 2022 | -0.8384 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.6% |
| 2023 | -0.8548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.0% |
| 2024 | -0.9764 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.2% |
| 2025 | -0.9454 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.2% |
Mauritania compared with similar countries
- Mauritania's -0.9454 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.7787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.2× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Mauritania's -0.9454 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.7919 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.2× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.565 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5665 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5636 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.565 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.8151 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5431 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.8776 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9764 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7813 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Mauritania
More reference data data for Mauritania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0975 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0216 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.327 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1337 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 14.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1178 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption - governance estimate in Mauritania?
- Control of corruption - governance estimate in Mauritania was -0.9454 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Mauritania?
- The highest recorded value was -0.2909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- What is the lowest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Mauritania?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.9809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019.
- How does Mauritania rank for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Mauritania ranks 166th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is control of corruption - governance estimate rising or falling in Mauritania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mauritania data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.