Georgia vs Kiribati: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Georgia
- Kiribati
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.3811 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0065 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kiribati ahead.
Georgia ranks 72nd and Kiribati ranks 73rd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2286 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.116 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 0.6558 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.6468 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Georgia or Kiribati?
- Georgia, at 0.3811 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Georgia and Kiribati?
- 0.0065 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Kiribati?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Kiribati rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Georgia ranks 72nd and Kiribati ranks 73rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.