Gambia vs North Macedonia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Gambia
-0.3342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
North Macedonia
-0.3292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Gambia rank
116th
North Macedonia rank
115th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Gambia
  • North Macedonia
-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-0199620102024

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports -0.3292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Gambia, a difference of 0.005 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 116th and North Macedonia ranks 115th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.2581 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3404 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Gambia
2000s -0.4807 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5345 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0538 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Gambia
2010s -0.6985 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2684 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4301 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 North Macedonia
2020s -0.2935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3717 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0783 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Gambia or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at -0.3292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Gambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Gambia and North Macedonia?
0.005 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and North Macedonia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Gambia and North Macedonia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Gambia ranks 116th and North Macedonia ranks 115th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs North Macedonia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/gambia-the/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/gambia-the/north-macedonia/">Gambia vs North Macedonia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.