Czechia vs Korea: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Czechia
0.9311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Korea
0.8496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Czechia rank
40th
Korea rank
43rd

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Czechia
  • Korea
0.20.40.60.81199620102024

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 0.9311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Korea, a difference of 0.0815 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Korea's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 40th and Korea ranks 43rd of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 3 and Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.7923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5258 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2665 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Czechia
2000s 0.4414 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0276 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Czechia
2010s 0.5353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4901 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Czechia
2020s 0.7897 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0238 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Czechia or Korea?
Czechia, at 0.9311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Korea as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Czechia and Korea?
0.0815 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Korea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Czechia and Korea rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Czechia ranks 40th and Korea ranks 43rd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Korea: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/czechia/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/czechia/korea-rep/">Czechia vs Korea: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.