Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands vs Czechia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands
0.8688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Czechia
0.9311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands rank
41st
Czechia rank
40th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands
  • Czechia
0.250.50.7511.2199620102024

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 0.9311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands, a difference of 0.0623 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands ahead.

Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands ranks 41st and Czechia ranks 40th of 204 countries.

Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands Czechia Difference Ahead
2000s 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4656 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7545 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands
2010s 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5475 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands
2020s 0.928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7897 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1384 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands or Czechia?
Czechia, at 0.9311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands and Czechia?
0.0623 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands and Czechia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands and Czechia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands ranks 41st and Czechia ranks 40th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands vs Czechia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/aruba/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/aruba/czechia/">Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands vs Czechia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.