Afghanistan vs Guinea-Bissau: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Afghanistan
-1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau
-1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
186th
Guinea-Bissau rank
188th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Guinea-Bissau
-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2-1-0.8199620102024

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 186th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 188th of 204 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s -1.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guinea-Bissau
2000s -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4801 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guinea-Bissau
2010s -1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1175 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guinea-Bissau
2020s -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0249 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Afghanistan or Guinea-Bissau?
Afghanistan, at -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Afghanistan and Guinea-Bissau?
0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Afghanistan and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Afghanistan ranks 186th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 188th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Guinea-Bissau: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/afghanistan/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/afghanistan/guinea-bissau/">Afghanistan vs Guinea-Bissau: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.