Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Malawi
2
in 2018
Zimbabwe
2
in 2018
Malawi rank
84th
Zimbabwe rank
84th

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Malawi
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.52196419912018

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 2 against 2 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Malawi ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 166 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 1 1.7 0.7 Zimbabwe
1990s 1.6 1 0.6 Malawi
2000s 2 1.1 0.9 Malawi
2010s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
Malawi, at 2 against 2 in Zimbabwe as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
0, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Malawi ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).