Madagascar vs Myanmar: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Madagascar
2
in 2018
Myanmar
2
in 2018
Madagascar rank
84th
Myanmar rank
84th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Madagascar
- Myanmar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 2 against 2 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Myanmar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 84th and Myanmar ranks 84th of 166 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2 | 0.6 | 1.4 | Madagascar |
| 1970s | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Madagascar |
| 1980s | 1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | Madagascar |
| 1990s | 2.78 | 0 | 2.78 | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 2.8 | 0 | 2.8 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 1.12 | 0.75 | 0.375 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Madagascar or Myanmar?
- Madagascar, at 2 against 2 in Myanmar as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Madagascar and Myanmar?
- 0, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Myanmar?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Madagascar and Myanmar rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Madagascar ranks 84th and Myanmar ranks 84th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).