Guatemala vs Lithuania: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Guatemala
3
in 2018
Lithuania
3
in 2018
Guatemala rank
1st
Lithuania rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Guatemala
  • Lithuania
0123183919282018

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 3 against 3 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 98 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Lithuania ahead.

Guatemala ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 8 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Lithuania Difference Ahead
1910s 1 3 2 Lithuania
1920s 2.75 2.5 0.25 Guatemala
1930s 1.2 1 0.2 Guatemala
1940s 2.2 1 1.2 Guatemala
1950s 1.4 1 0.4 Guatemala
1960s 1.5 1 0.5 Guatemala
1970s 1.4 1 0.4 Guatemala
1980s 1.56 1 0.5556 Guatemala
1990s 3 2.9 0.1 Guatemala
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Guatemala or Lithuania?
Guatemala, at 3 against 3 in Lithuania as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Guatemala and Lithuania?
0, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Lithuania?
98 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2018.
How do Guatemala and Lithuania rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Guatemala ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).