Democratic Republic of Congo vs Vietnam: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
1
in 2018
Vietnam
1
in 2018
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
118th
Vietnam rank
118th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Vietnam
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 1 against 1 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Vietnam ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 118th and Vietnam ranks 118th of 167 countries.
Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 1.67 | 1 | 0.6667 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Vietnam?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 1 against 1 in Vietnam as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Vietnam?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Vietnam?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2018.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Vietnam rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 118th and Vietnam ranks 118th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).