Chad vs Equatorial Guinea: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Chad
0
in 2018
Equatorial Guinea
0
in 2018
Chad rank
150th
Equatorial Guinea rank
150th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Chad
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0 against 0 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Chad ranks 150th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 150th of 166 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0.625 | 0 | 0.625 | Chad |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Chad or Equatorial Guinea?
- Chad, at 0 against 0 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2018.
- How do Chad and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Chad ranks 150th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 150th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).