Botswana vs Madagascar: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Botswana
2
in 2018
Madagascar
2
in 2018
Botswana rank
84th
Madagascar rank
84th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Botswana
- Madagascar
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 2 against 2 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Madagascar ahead.
Botswana ranks 84th and Madagascar ranks 84th of 166 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Madagascar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 1.2 | 0.8 | Botswana |
| 1980s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Botswana |
| 1990s | 2 | 2.78 | 0.7778 | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 2 | 2.8 | 0.8 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 2 | 1.22 | 0.7778 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Botswana or Madagascar?
- Botswana, at 2 against 2 in Madagascar as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Botswana and Madagascar?
- 0, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Madagascar?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2018.
- How do Botswana and Madagascar rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Botswana ranks 84th and Madagascar ranks 84th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).