Trinidad and Tobago vs Zambia: Competitive elections
Trinidad and Tobago
1
in 2025
Zambia
1
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Zambia rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Zambia
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 1 against 1 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Zambia ahead.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Trinidad and Tobago | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.8 | 0 | 0.8 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1990s | 1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 1 | 0.8333 | 0.1667 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Trinidad and Tobago or Zambia?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 1 against 1 in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Trinidad and Tobago and Zambia?
- 0, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Zambia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and Zambia rank globally for competitive elections?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.