Trinidad and Tobago vs Ukraine: Competitive elections

Trinidad and Tobago
1
in 2025
Ukraine
1
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Ukraine rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Ukraine
00.20.40.60.81188919572025

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 1 against 1 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Ukraine ahead.

Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st and Ukraine ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Trinidad and Tobago Ukraine Difference Ahead
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0.8 0 0.8 Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 1 0 1 Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 1 0 1 Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 1 0.6 0.4 Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Trinidad and Tobago or Ukraine?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 1 against 1 in Ukraine as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Trinidad and Tobago and Ukraine?
0, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Ukraine?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Trinidad and Tobago and Ukraine rank globally for competitive elections?
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st and Ukraine ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.