Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Zambia: Competitive elections
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1
in 2025
Zambia
1
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Zambia rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Zambia
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 1 against 1 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 89 shared years of data; in 1937 it was Zambia ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1990s | 1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 1 | 0.8333 | 0.1667 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Zambia?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 1 against 1 in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Zambia?
- 0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Zambia?
- 89 years are reported by both, from 1937 to 2025.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Zambia rank globally for competitive elections?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.