Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Sweden: Competitive elections

Saint Kitts and Nevis
1
in 2025
Sweden
1
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Sweden
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 1 against 1 in Sweden, a difference of 0.

Across all 89 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Sweden Difference Ahead
1930s 0 1 1 Sweden
1940s 0 1 1 Sweden
1950s 0 1 1 Sweden
1960s 0.3 1 0.7 Sweden
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Sweden?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 1 against 1 in Sweden as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sweden?
0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sweden?
89 years are reported by both, from 1937 to 2025.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sweden rank globally for competitive elections?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.