Sri Lanka vs St. Vincent and the Grenadines: Competitive elections
Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
St. Vincent and the Grenadines
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
1st
St. Vincent and the Grenadines rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Sri Lanka
- St. Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 1 against 1 in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 1st and St. Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 2 and St. Vincent and the Grenadines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sri Lanka |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0.3 | 1 | 0.7 | St. Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | St. Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Sri Lanka or St. Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Sri Lanka, at 1 against 1 in St. Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Sri Lanka and St. Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and St. Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
- How do Sri Lanka and St. Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for competitive elections?
- Sri Lanka ranks 1st and St. Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.