Sri Lanka vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Competitive elections
Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Sri Lanka
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 89 shared years of data; in 1937 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 3 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | Sri Lanka |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sri Lanka |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0.3 | 1 | 0.7 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Sri Lanka or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Sri Lanka, at 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Sri Lanka and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 89 years are reported by both, from 1937 to 2025.
- How do Sri Lanka and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for competitive elections?
- Sri Lanka ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.