Solomon Islands vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Competitive elections
Solomon Islands
1
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1
in 2025
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Solomon Islands
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 89 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1970s | 0.2 | 1 | 0.8 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Solomon Islands or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Solomon Islands, at 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Solomon Islands and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 89 years are reported by both, from 1937 to 2025.
- How do Solomon Islands and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for competitive elections?
- Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.