Sierra Leone vs Uzbekistan: Competitive elections

Sierra Leone
0
in 2025
Uzbekistan
0
in 2025
Sierra Leone rank
116th
Uzbekistan rank
116th

Competitive elections over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • Uzbekistan
00.20.40.60.81186519452025

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 0 against 0 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 120 shared years of data; in 1896 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

Sierra Leone ranks 116th and Uzbekistan ranks 116th of 197 countries.

Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sierra Leone Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0.6 0 0.6 Sierra Leone
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0.3 0 0.3 Sierra Leone
2000s 1 0 1 Sierra Leone
2010s 1 0 1 Sierra Leone
2020s 0.5 0 0.5 Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Sierra Leone or Uzbekistan?
Sierra Leone, at 0 against 0 in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Sierra Leone and Uzbekistan?
0, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Uzbekistan?
120 years are reported by both, from 1896 to 2025.
How do Sierra Leone and Uzbekistan rank globally for competitive elections?
Sierra Leone ranks 116th and Uzbekistan ranks 116th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.