Portugal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Competitive elections

Portugal
1
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1
in 2025
Portugal rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Portugal
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.

Across all 89 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Portugal ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0.3 0.3 Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.4 1 0.6 Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Portugal or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Portugal, at 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Portugal and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
89 years are reported by both, from 1937 to 2025.
How do Portugal and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for competitive elections?
Portugal ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.