Papua New Guinea vs Paraguay: Competitive elections

Papua New Guinea
1
in 2025
Paraguay
1
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Paraguay rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Paraguay
00.20.40.60.81181119182025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 142 shared years of data; in 1884 it was Paraguay ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Paraguay Difference Ahead
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0.5 0 0.5 Papua New Guinea
1980s 1 0.1 0.9 Papua New Guinea
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Papua New Guinea or Paraguay?
Papua New Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Paraguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Papua New Guinea and Paraguay?
0, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Paraguay?
142 years are reported by both, from 1884 to 2025.
How do Papua New Guinea and Paraguay rank globally for competitive elections?
Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.