Panama vs Trinidad and Tobago: Competitive elections

Panama
1
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
1
in 2025
Panama rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Panama
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.20.40.60.81188919572025

How they compare

Panama currently reports 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 123 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Panama ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 regions.

Across the 13 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0.4 0 0.4 Panama
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0.8 0.8 0 β€”
1970s 0 1 1 Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0 1 1 Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Panama or Trinidad and Tobago?
Panama, at 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Panama and Trinidad and Tobago?
0, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Trinidad and Tobago?
123 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2025.
How do Panama and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for competitive elections?
Panama ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.