North Macedonia vs San Marino: Competitive elections

North Macedonia
1
in 2025
San Marino
1
in 2025
North Macedonia rank
1st
San Marino rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • North Macedonia
  • San Marino
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 1 against 1 in San Marino, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was San Marino ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and San Marino in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia San Marino Difference Ahead
1910s 0 1 1 San Marino
1920s 0.9 0.1 0.8 North Macedonia
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0.5 0.5 San Marino
1950s 0 1 1 San Marino
1960s 0 1 1 San Marino
1970s 0 1 1 San Marino
1980s 0 1 1 San Marino
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, North Macedonia or San Marino?
North Macedonia, at 1 against 1 in San Marino as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between North Macedonia and San Marino?
0, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and San Marino?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do North Macedonia and San Marino rank globally for competitive elections?
North Macedonia ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.