New Zealand vs Zambia: Competitive elections

New Zealand
1
in 2025
Zambia
1
in 2025
New Zealand rank
1st
Zambia rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • New Zealand
  • Zambia
00.20.40.60.81184119332025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1 against 1 in Zambia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Zambia Difference Ahead
1910s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1920s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1930s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1940s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1950s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1960s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1970s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1980s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1990s 1 0.9 0.1 New Zealand
2000s 1 1 0
2010s 1 0.6 0.4 New Zealand
2020s 1 0.8333 0.1667 New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, New Zealand or Zambia?
New Zealand, at 1 against 1 in Zambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between New Zealand and Zambia?
0, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Zambia?
115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
How do New Zealand and Zambia rank globally for competitive elections?
New Zealand ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.