New Zealand vs United Kingdom: Competitive elections

New Zealand
1
in 2025
United Kingdom
1
in 2025
New Zealand rank
1st
United Kingdom rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • New Zealand
  • United Kingdom
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1 against 1 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.

Across all 185 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 197 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 19 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1840s 0 1 1 United Kingdom
1850s 0 1 1 United Kingdom
1860s 0.5 1 0.5 United Kingdom
1870s 1 1 0 β€”
1880s 1 1 0 β€”
1890s 1 1 0 β€”
1900s 1 1 0 β€”
1910s 1 1 0 β€”
1920s 1 1 0 β€”
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, New Zealand or United Kingdom?
New Zealand, at 1 against 1 in United Kingdom as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between New Zealand and United Kingdom?
0, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and United Kingdom?
185 years are reported by both, from 1841 to 2025.
How do New Zealand and United Kingdom rank globally for competitive elections?
New Zealand ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.