Netherlands vs New Zealand: Competitive elections

Netherlands
1
in 2025
New Zealand
1
in 2025
Netherlands rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Netherlands
  • New Zealand
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 1 against 1 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 185 shared years of data; in 1841 it was New Zealand ahead.

Netherlands ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 19 decades both report, Netherlands averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands New Zealand Difference Ahead
1840s 0.2222 0 0.2222 Netherlands
1850s 1 0 1 Netherlands
1860s 1 0.5 0.5 Netherlands
1870s 1 1 0 β€”
1880s 1 1 0 β€”
1890s 1 1 0 β€”
1900s 1 1 0 β€”
1910s 1 1 0 β€”
1920s 1 1 0 β€”
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 0.4 1 0.6 New Zealand
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Netherlands or New Zealand?
Netherlands, at 1 against 1 in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Netherlands and New Zealand?
0, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and New Zealand?
185 years are reported by both, from 1841 to 2025.
How do Netherlands and New Zealand rank globally for competitive elections?
Netherlands ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.