Moldova vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Competitive elections

Moldova
1
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1
in 2025
Moldova rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Moldova
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.20.40.60.81180019122025

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.

Across all 86 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Moldova ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Moldova Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0.3 0.3 Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0 1 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0 1 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.6 1 0.4 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Moldova or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Moldova, at 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Moldova and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
86 years are reported by both, from 1940 to 2025.
How do Moldova and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for competitive elections?
Moldova ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.