Micronesia (country) vs Papua New Guinea: Competitive elections

Micronesia (country)
1
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
1
in 2025
Micronesia (country) rank
1st
Papua New Guinea rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Micronesia (country)
  • Papua New Guinea
00.20.40.60.81188419542025

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 1 against 1 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.

Across all 79 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (country) ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (country) Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0.1 0.5 0.4 Papua New Guinea
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Micronesia (country) or Papua New Guinea?
Micronesia (country), at 1 against 1 in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Micronesia (country) and Papua New Guinea?
0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Papua New Guinea?
79 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2025.
How do Micronesia (country) and Papua New Guinea rank globally for competitive elections?
Micronesia (country) ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.