Malta vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Competitive elections

Malta
1
in 2025
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1
in 2025
Malta rank
1st
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Malta
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
00.20.40.60.81184019322025

How they compare

Malta currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1950s 1 0 1 Malta
1960s 1 0.1 0.9 Malta
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Malta or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Malta, at 1 against 1 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Malta and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do Malta and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for competitive elections?
Malta ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.