Kenya vs Sao Tome and Principe: Competitive elections

Kenya
1
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
1
in 2025
Kenya rank
1st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Kenya
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 1 against 1 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 131 shared years of data; in 1895 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Kenya ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 14 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0.1 0 0.1 Kenya
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0.9 0.9 Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.6 1 0.4 Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.7 1 0.3 Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Kenya or Sao Tome and Principe?
Kenya, at 1 against 1 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Kenya and Sao Tome and Principe?
0, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Sao Tome and Principe?
131 years are reported by both, from 1895 to 2025.
How do Kenya and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for competitive elections?
Kenya ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.