Jamaica vs New Zealand: Competitive elections
Jamaica
1
in 2025
New Zealand
1
in 2025
Jamaica rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Jamaica
- New Zealand
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 1 against 1 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 142 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1890s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1960s | 0.8 | 1 | 0.2 | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Jamaica or New Zealand?
- Jamaica, at 1 against 1 in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Jamaica and New Zealand?
- 0, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and New Zealand?
- 142 years are reported by both, from 1884 to 2025.
- How do Jamaica and New Zealand rank globally for competitive elections?
- Jamaica ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.