Iceland vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Competitive elections

Iceland
1
in 2025
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1
in 2025
Iceland rank
1st
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Iceland
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
00.20.40.60.81184419342025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1950s 1 0 1 Iceland
1960s 1 0.1 0.9 Iceland
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Iceland or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Iceland, at 1 against 1 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Iceland and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for competitive elections?
Iceland ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.