Honduras vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Competitive elections
Honduras
1
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1
in 2025
Honduras rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Honduras
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 89 shared years of data; in 1937 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Honduras ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | Honduras |
| 1960s | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1980s | 0.8 | 1 | 0.2 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0.9 | 1 | 0.1 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 0.4 | 1 | 0.6 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 0.8333 | 1 | 0.1667 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Honduras or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Honduras, at 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Honduras and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 89 years are reported by both, from 1937 to 2025.
- How do Honduras and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for competitive elections?
- Honduras ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.