Guinea-Bissau vs Turkmenistan: Competitive elections

Guinea-Bissau
0
in 2025
Turkmenistan
0
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
116th
Turkmenistan rank
116th

Competitive elections over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Turkmenistan
00.20.40.60.81180019122025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 against 0 in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 134 shared years of data; in 1892 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 116th and Turkmenistan ranks 116th of 197 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0.4 0 0.4 Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.7 0 0.7 Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.6 0 0.6 Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.5 0 0.5 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Guinea-Bissau or Turkmenistan?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0 against 0 in Turkmenistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Guinea-Bissau and Turkmenistan?
0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Turkmenistan?
134 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2025.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Turkmenistan rank globally for competitive elections?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 116th and Turkmenistan ranks 116th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.