Grenada vs Sao Tome and Principe: Competitive elections

Grenada
1
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
1
in 2025
Grenada rank
1st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Grenada
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 1 against 1 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Grenada ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0.3 0 0.3 Grenada
1970s 0.9 0 0.9 Grenada
1980s 0.6 0 0.6 Grenada
1990s 1 0.9 0.1 Grenada
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Grenada or Sao Tome and Principe?
Grenada, at 1 against 1 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Grenada and Sao Tome and Principe?
0, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Sao Tome and Principe?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do Grenada and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for competitive elections?
Grenada ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.