Ghana vs Trinidad and Tobago: Competitive elections

Ghana
1
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
1
in 2025
Ghana rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Ghana
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.20.40.60.81188919572025

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.

Across all 124 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Ghana ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0.1 0.8 0.7 Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.3 1 0.7 Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.1 1 0.9 Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.4 1 0.6 Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Ghana or Trinidad and Tobago?
Ghana, at 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Ghana and Trinidad and Tobago?
0, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Trinidad and Tobago?
124 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2025.
How do Ghana and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for competitive elections?
Ghana ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.